growyourwings: (Default)
I had thought to take my mother to see Marley and Me, but she wanted to see Frost/Nixon. 

I probably would not have gone to see that movie if she didn't want to.  If only because I only have so much patience for seeing movies and there are others to choose from (for example a local IMAX theatre is showing The Day the Earth Stood Still.  *is tempted.*)

Over the phone she told me Frank Langella was in it.  That up'd the film's draw for me.  I've been a fan of Langella since 1974 when he was in the Mark of Zorro and then later when he played Dracula in 1979 (*deep dreamy sigh*).  I've no idea if his acting was any good in those.  I was a teenager and fell in love with his eyes and dark long hair.  *is shallow*  What?!  At least he didn't play a SPARKLY vampire!!!  *rolls eyes*





*girlie sigh*

I've seen Langella in several other things over the years.  And have enjoyed his performances - now more for his acting than his looks.  But he'll always hold a place in my heart for me because of that early crush.

When the film opened and I saw it was a Ron Howard film, I thought, "Oh this will probably be good."  I'm usually very impressed with Howard's films.

Other than my memories of the Watergate era and post-era, I knew nothing about this film.  I remembered seeing the Frost/Nixon interviews on TV.  But I don't remember any of their content really.  If you had asked me prior to seeing this film about David Frost, I would have called him a journalist.

I learned that back then--he was a talk show host--a celebrity.  Huh, who knew?

I never would have thought there was a story in the Frost/Nixon interview.  I was wrong. 

I enjoyed it a LOT.  I thought Langella was amazing.  He was very, very good.

I just did a quick Google on this and I guess the film is based on a play that Langella performed in as well.

Michael Sheen (I'm assuming he's a member of the Martin Sheen family) did Frost.  I had no trouble at all believing him as Frost.   (ETA:  Nope -- Michael Sheen is no relation to Martin Sheen.)

It's too bad they decided to release this film over a holiday season where it's competing against Marley and Me, The Day the Earth Stood Still, Twilight, etc.  You should have seen all the lines and kids at the theatre.  It was mobbed.  But there were maybe 20 people in the theatre that was showing Frost/Nixon.  

It's a shame--because it was a very good movie.  It wasn't so much a history or a political movie (although there was some of that.)  It was more a human drama.  A battle of wills.  A lightweight celebrity going up against Tricky Dicky.  And in the end, when Nixon "confessed" on air....I could just feel it.


ETA:  I have so much trouble typing Frost SLASH Nixon.  *shudders*

growyourwings: (JDM)
Bob and Tim just went off to see The Dark Knight.

I just sat down to my laptop which was still open on a search for TDK reviews. Some new items had been posted since I walked away.

Warner Brother's says TDK will definitely break the previous opening weekend numbers.

And several more reviews saying how outstanding the movie and Heath Ledger is.

And this from Blog Critics Magazine by Chris Beaumont...

The Dark Knight is a complex film. It does not offer up any easy answers, but instead adds layer upon layer of depth. The characters grow, breathe, change, develop, and become more than mere characters. All of the primary players take on important roles in a play that reaches Shakespearean heights, as they are forced to make more difficult decisions than they had ever had to make in their lives.

...

By now, you have probably read your fill of praise for Heath Ledger's performance. Critics must be sounding like a broken record, and let me tell you that the praise being doled out is much deserved. Heath Ledger is a force of nature; he commands your attention, he draws you in with a maniacal charisma. You dare not look away lest he turn his sights on you.



Hey! I thought Jensen Ackles is the force of nature! Oh well, I guess Heath can share the limelight a bit here. [SAA Moment Tagged.]

More from Beaumont...


The jaw-dropping performance, the way he commands attention, the way Heath poured himself into this role, everything points towards Oscar for Heath Ledger. It is a career defining performance, one that would have definitively placed him on the Hollywood map.


Another review I read this morning (can't remember where or which one) said that Heath just disappeared from the film...he *was* The Joker. I remembered thinking the same thing once or twice while watching the film.

Not to forget the other great performances in this film, Beaumont continues...

Christian Bale turns in yet another strong performance. He is fast becoming the definitive Batman. He has the skills and the presence to portray the conflicted Bruce Wayne, the emotionally tortured soul whose very existence is a battle within himself. Not only can Bale portray the emotional gravitas, he is more than capable of delivering the fisticuffs

....

Aaron Eckhart leads the charge as Harvey Dent, the new, take charge DA who is not afraid of putting himself in the line of fire, although he too is a conflicted soul waiting for a push in the right direction. Then there is Maggie Gyllenhaal, who steps into the role of Rachel Dawes vacated by Katie Holmes, and delivers. She carries a lot of emotional weight with ease. Not to be left out are the returning players from the first film, Michael Caine as Alfred, who is always ready with words of wisdom as well as possessing the wisdom to know when to deal with certain items (you will see in the film), Gary Oldman as Commissioner Gordon in a performance that gets you personally involved, and Morgan Freeman as Lucius Fox, Bruce Wayne's chief gadget maker and confidant.


And Beaumont's bottom line..

Bottom line. I cannot recommend this movie enough. It is unrelentingly dark, but it is also emotionally involving as it takes you on a cerebral and visceral roller coaster through the darkened streets of Gotham. This is the finest film to reach the screens thus far this year, and one that actually deserves all of the praise it has received. From top to bottom, this is an amazing experience and one of the few summer blockbusters to work on this high an artistic level as opposed to just trying to deliver an enjoyable summer cinematic experience.
growyourwings: (JDM)
Woke up this morning still thinking about The Dark Knight (TDK). My husband and son are planning on going to go see it this afternoon and I'm tempted to go with them to see it again.

I was thinking more about Heath in the movie and while I do really believe that his was outstanding, there was this part of me this morning that couldn't help but wonder if I was influenced in that belief by his death. So I did some googling this morning to see what else was being said about TDK.

I found this from The LA Times, The Envelope, The Awards Insider by Tom O'Neill:

Does Heath Ledger have an Oscar I.O.U. for 'The Dark Knight'?

Let's forget for just a moment about all of the hallelujah reviews surrounding Heath Ledger's performance in "The Dark Knight." Can Heath Ledger win an Oscar just because he's holding an I.O.U.?

...

Now Ledger really deserves it, if we believe the New York Times' review of his Joker in "The Dark Knight": " He’s just a clown in black velvet, but he’s also some kind of masterpiece."

"This is a career-making performance if ever there was one," says USA Today about Ledger in "The Dark Knight." "Too bad it was a career-ending one as well."

"Not since Hannibal Lecter has a villain been so terrifying, so engaging and so memorable," says E! Online. If that's an apt analogy, then it's good kudos news for Ledger considering Anthony Hopkins won best actor. But is that the category Ledger should compete in — or should he go supporting? Read more about that great debate — CLICK HERE.

I told Emily and Alex yesterday after seeing the film that I thought Heath's Joker reminded me of Hannibal Lecter. He was just totally evil.

Then I followed the link in the above article to the New York Times references and read this by Manohla Dargis..

Pitched at the divide between art and industry, poetry and entertainment, it goes darker and deeper than any Hollywood movie of its comic-book kind — including “Batman Begins,”

...

Mr. Nolan has found a way to make Batman relevant to his time — meaning, to ours — investing him with shadows that remind you of the character’s troubled beginning but without lingering mustiness. That’s nothing new, but what is surprising, actually startling, is that in “The Dark Knight,” which picks up the story after the first film ends, Mr. Nolan has turned Batman (again played by the sturdy, stoic Mr. Bale) into a villain’s sidekick.

That would be the Joker, of course, a demonic creation and three-ring circus of one wholly inhabited by Heath Ledger. Mr. Ledger died in January at age 28 from an accidental overdose, after principal photography ended, and his death might have cast a paralyzing pall over the film if the performance were not so alive. But his Joker is a creature of such ghastly life, and the performance is so visceral, creepy and insistently present that the characterization pulls you in almost at once. When the Joker enters one fray with a murderous flourish and that sawed-off smile, his morbid grin a mirror of the Black Dahlia’s ear-to-ear grimace, your nervous laughter will die in your throat.

..... [and finally] ...

Mr. Ledger’s performance and the film’s visual beauty are transporting. (In Imax, it’s even more operatic.) No matter how cynical you feel about Hollywood, it is hard not to fall for a film that makes room for a shot of the Joker leaning out the window of a stolen police car and laughing into the wind, the city’s colored lights gleaming behind him like jewels. He’s just a clown in black velvet, but he’s also some kind of masterpiece.


*sigh*


Yes it was a good movie....
growyourwings: (JDM)
I've never been a huge Batman fan.  I've seen all the movies and of course the campy TV show.  Haven't read any of the "real" stuff. 

Enjoyed the Michael Keaton versions okay and the ones that followed (can't recall who played Batman in those--a blond man is all I'm remembering--well they were ... okay.

I saw Batman Begins several months after it came out and I really enjoyed it.  So when I heard there was a sequel I figured I'd see it.  When I heard Heath Ledger was playing the Joker, I really wanted to see it.   Of all the previous Batman movies, the one where Jack Nicholson played the Joker was my favorite.  So I was very curious to see how Heath would do following up on that.

I never go to see big movies on opening weekends--too many people.  But I felt compelled to go today.

All this build up is just me trying to figure out what even to say about The Dark Knight...other than I'm blown away.  It was a long movie--but never felt too long.  There were, of course, plenty of action scenes, but there were also a lot of scenes without action--but they were just as riveting.

The storyline was terrific and gripping.

The special effects were marvelous.

The way a "comic book" character movie was used to delve into human character was awe inspiring.

The music was wonderful.

All the acting was terrific.  Every.  Single.  Actor--was terrific.

However--Heath Ledger and his portrayal of the Joker blew them all away.  He was mesmerizing.  And I don't think because this was "his last film."  He was just amazing.  What a great loss.

I just read a blog review which said:

Everyone should watch The Dark Knight (TDK) at least once. It matters little whether you are a fan of the Batman character -- this is a movie that transcends its origins and is recommended viewing for one and all.

Very, very true.

I guess this movie is blowing away the record books on attendance.  It's worth it.  The review above continues by saying:

A common review would be that TDK is the greatest movie based on a comic book, but that would be too-obvious a thing to say, and would also be doing the movie a disservice. The Dark Knight shines as a commendable work in itself. In many ways, the movie is the script. A script that is perfect, flawless, masterful, and drives the movie throughout -- this is one flick that doesn't have to rely on the crutches of action and explosions to carry it forward. The action serves to add to the movie's flavour, but it does not define TDK.

The actors are obviously inspired by the tight writing and exacting characterizations that the script offers -- everyone does a great job with his or her role, there isn't a single actor that brings the show down. And then there's (the late) Heath Ledger playing the Joker. Amongst all the good performances, the Joker -- ever the wildcard in the deck, steals every scene, every shot -- he is electric with his nuanced delivery, frightening through his expressions, hilarious in his body language, a presence through his makeup. It is a performance that is simply put, breathtaking. If there is a character that defines the dark soul of TDK, it is the twisted Joker. I pity the guy who has to fill Heath Ledger's shoes in future outings.


Since I'm unable to voice my own thoughts well about this movie.  I'll just point above and say, "What he said."

Oh and BTW?  There were a LOT of great trailers shown before the movie started.  Not just Watchmen, which I've already talked about.  But now I want to see the new Mummy movie, the new Bond movie and a few others that I can't even remember now.  Oh!  And I saw Sterling Brown briefly during the trailer for the new Dinero - Pacino movie, The Righteous Kill.  I leaned over to Emily to say, "That's...."  and she immediately said, "I KNOW Mom."  I guess I must be doing *something* right anyway.

growyourwings: (jared)
I know--we're way behind the times.

We enjoyed it.   I'd told Mr. GYW that some folks just loved this and others hated it.  Partway through he kept asking why anyone wouldn't like this.  We figured it was the film style (ala Blair Witch or Ghostfacers). 

However, when I woke up this morning I kept thinking about the ending of the movie.  Perhaps that's why people didn't like it.

Off to start my first full work week in several weeks (due to vacations, Mom's surgery, various doctor appts, etc.)  Although I'm considering leaving at noon to work from home to do some needed online training (needed to maintain my professional certification.)

However I just saw a new big bang posted.  I still haven't worked my way through all of them.  And all I want to do is immerse myself in them today.

*Sigh*

We have a program steering committee this morning.  And I've no idea whether this is going to be a good or bad meeting because I was out so much last week that I wasn't really that involved with prepping for it.
growyourwings: (Default)
I watched the first 3/4 of PS I Love You, then SPN 3x15 and then the rest of PS I Love You.

I had no high expectations for PS I Love You.  I just knew that folks loved JDM in it.  So I actually enjoyed and liked the movie!  I really like Kathy Bates in it  And James Marsters and Hillary Swank and her girlfriends.  And I loved Jerry!  (Who wouldn't love him?)

And JDM?  OMG.  I really liked JDM as John Winchester--but that was the first time I'd ever seen or heard of JDM.  I wasn't watching Grey's at the time.  The only reason I decided to watch Grey's was because of JDM and how much everyone said they LOVED him in it.  And man, when I met the character of Denny?  Again, who wouldn't love him?

But as John Winchester?  I love the character--but never totally went to the gah-gah OMG hot land with JDM as John.

But JDM in PS I Love You?  I'm back to Denny-type love.  All I could think about was gah-gah hot and man I LOVE JDM!

And his ass?  OMG.

(So now I'm actually glad I accidently pressed BUY rather than RENT.)

growyourwings: (hee)


P.S. I Love You is on iTunes (link).

Yay!  Although I've heard that it's not a terrific movie, I've also heard that JDM is great!  So this is definitely something I'll be renting through iTunes this weekend.  Glad it's not only for sale--but I wouldn't buy it from iTunes.  I don't buy a lot of movies any more through iTunes because I can afford to waste storage space on so many movies I may never watch again.

Update:  Dammit I can't win sometimes.  In the process of clicking on "RENT" button, iTunes popped up a new Terms of Service Agreement.  So I clicked the appropriate button and then it asked me to "try my purchase again."  Without thinking I clicked the "BUY" button rather than the "RENT" button.  Because I had already entered my password, iTunes merrily purchased my new movie.  Dammit  I didn't *want* to buy it.  I wanted to RENT it.  So I paid $10 more than I wanted to and now I either store the movie and take up space or delete the movie when I'm done and feel like I threw away $10.  Grrr.  Oh well.  *shrugs it off*

Profile

growyourwings: (Default)
growyourwings

July 2020

S M T W T F S
   1234
5678 91011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031 

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 11th, 2025 06:33 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios